After God: What can atheists learn from believers?
Jeremy Bentham, his disciple John Stuart Mill once wrote, would always ask of a proposition or belief, â€œIs it true?â€ By contrast, Benthamâ€™s contemporary Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Mill observed, thought â€œWhat is the meaning of it?â€ was a much more interesting question.
Todayâ€™s New Atheists â€“Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, Daniel Dennett and the late Christopher Hitchens principal among them â€“ are the heirs of Bentham, rather than Coleridge. For them, religion â€“ or the great monotheistic faiths, at any rate â€“ are bundles of beliefs (about the existence of a supernatural being, the origins of the universe and so on) whose claims to truth donâ€™t stand up to rational scrutiny. And once the falsity of those beliefs has been established, they imply, there is nothing much left to say.
The New Atheists remind one of Edward Gibbon, who said of a visit to the cathedral at Chartres: â€œI paused only to dart a look at the stately pile of superstition and passed on.â€ They glance at the stately pile of story and myth bequeathed to humanity by religion and quickly move on, pausing only to ask of the benighted millions who continue to profess one faith or another that they keep their beliefs to themselves and donâ€™t demand that they be heard in the public square.