Emergence, Supervenience, and Personal Knowledge: A Response to Philip Clayton
My response to Philip Clayton’s paper is in four parts: a “Reader’s Digest” version of Clayton’s basic positions an attempt to show that Clayton’s positions are closer to Polanyi than he indicates a brief suggestion about the theology/science engagement a question about logos and telos-in Aristotle, Aquinas, Polanyi, and Clayton, particularly as it pertains to…