H+: Bringing Arts/Sciences and Design Into the Discussion of Transhumanism
The central issue now is the actuality of altering the human form is practicable, duplicating the mind is probable, and extending life is feasible.
The central issue now is the actuality of altering the human form is practicable, duplicating the mind is probable, and extending life is feasible.
The prospect of posthumanity is feared for at least two reasons. One is that the state of being posthuman might in itself be degrading. Another is that posthumans might pose a threat to “ordinary” humans.
Explicit or not, ontologies play a decisive role in the interpretation of any scientific theory.
The author wishes to clarify the confusions that exist on both sides of the creation-evolution debate.
My approach challenges naturalism, but in no sense does it compete with science. The hard work of science still remains to be done, and theology can never be a substitute for this effort.
Exploring the compatibility of the transhumanist project with the major world faiths.
Before we turn to the Principle of Maximum Diversity, we review the development of the Principle of Least Action (or Effort), one of the mainstays of modern physics.
How one understands the human person influences his or her approach in healing the human person.
Reviewing William Dembski’s case for intelligent design.
We face the field head-on to evaluate what the pundits are saying, what scientists are building, and how close we really are to the edge of the precipice.