-
Why Huston Smith Matters
1. Recently there have been some expressions of disappointment at Huston Smith’s assertions in his latest book to the...
0 -
Responses to Dembski
Metaviews 005. 2001.01.30. Approximately 3103 words. There were a number of responses to Metaviews 004 by William Dembski.In the...
-
Is Intelligent Design Testable– A Response to Eugenie Scott
Eugenie Scott is a physical anthropologist who as director of theNationalCenterfor Science Education travels theUnited Stateswarning audiences about the...
-
Review of John Haught’s “God After Darwin”
I raise concerns about his vision of a loving God and a metaphysics of the future because I believe...
-
Robust Formational Possibilities
Since my name and views were often engaged in Bill Dembski’s Metaviews #098 essay, here are a few comments...
-
Intelligent Design Coming Clean
1. Cards on the Table In the movie Dream Team starring Michael Keaton, Keaton plays a psychiatric patient who...
-
Baylor University Responds to Misconceptions about the Polanyi Center Controversy
In light of remarks on the META list that indicate a significantmisunderstanding of the recent events surrounding the Polanyi...
-
Formal letter of protest concerning Dembski’s removal
STATEMENT OF THE CRANACH INSTITUTEPROTESTING THE REMOVAL OF WILLIAM DEMBSKIAS DIRECTOR OF THE MICHAEL POLANYI CENTERAT BAYLOR UNIVERSITY The...
-
Sedimentary Muddle: Review of Robert Pennock’s “The Tower of Babel”
It is odd how certain books can be turning points. I can think of three Rwhich have created turning...
-
Review of William Dembski’s Intelligent Design
The advent of Michael Behe’s book Darwin‘s Black Box was probably one of the most provocative manuscripts to entice...