Science, Semiotics and the Sacred
An ontology and epistemology that looks only to materialism and reductionism for its explanations of phenomena will have a hard time explaining information itself.
An ontology and epistemology that looks only to materialism and reductionism for its explanations of phenomena will have a hard time explaining information itself.
At a time of heightened alienation and conflict between Islam and the West, there is a need to promote a “dialogue of civilizations” as called for by President Khatami. The dialogue between science and religion provides an important point of departure.
The core of the evolution wars is whether a scientific understanding of biology allows room for religious and philosophical commitments to purpose in human life, purposes that somehow also must connect to the unfolding history of the universe.
1) Cultural Ambivalence 2) Definitional Ambiguity 3) Metaphysics Matters 4) Relational Revelations 5) Science as a Spiritual Quest 6) The Sciences of Religion Revisited 7) Healthy Semiotics 8) Innumerate Nescience 9) Philistine Fideism 10) Moral Muddles
There may be compelling reasons to suppose our universe really is one piece of a vast multiverse. On the other hand, multiverse theory may be the 21st century equivalent of counting how many angels will fit on the head of a pin.
If God is everywhere, then why is God so hard to perceive? One could imagine a God more like a Chairman Mao or a Comrade Stalin with photographs of himself hung everywhere in nature and everywhere the secret police to enforce our acquiescence.
Responding to Michael Ruse’s thoughtful response to my essays on “Human Creativity: Accelerating Complexity and Evolutionary Discontinuity” and his more colorful criticism at the recent Haverford Conference on “Genetics, Bioethics, and Religion.”